Juan Melendez Voices United for Justice Project

About Us

Juan's Story

Speaking Engagements

International Tours

Exonerees Talking

Death Penalty Info


Get Involved

En Español


Urgent action is needed in the case of Troy Davis!

On June 25th the United States Supreme Court refused to hear his case and Troy, who may very well be innocent, will be executed unlessimmediate pressure is brought to bear on the State Board of Pardons and Paroles. Please read the Amnesty International Press release provided below and learn more about Mr. Davis's case by visiting his website at

You can send or fax a letter urging clemency to the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles:
2 Martin Luther King, Jr, Drive, SE, Suite 458, Balcony Level, East Tower, Atlanta, Georgia 3033-44909, fax number 404-651-8502.

Update July 22nd, 2007:

Troy Davis was granted a 90-day reprieve on Monday, July 16. During the next 90 days, the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles will examine Troy's claim of innocence. Thank you for all of your communications to the BPP. You have made a difference! If you have not already written to the BPP, please do so as soon as possible. It is not too late and in fact a continuous influx of letters in support of Troy will by a constant reminder to the BPP that the world is still watching them very closely.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:          Contact:  Wende Gozan at 212/633-4247
Monday, June 25, 2007                    or Brian Evans at 202/544-0200 x496
( Washington , D.C. ) -- Amnesty International is deeply disappointed with today's Supreme Court ruling that permits the execution of Troy Anthony Davis in Georgia . The organization maintains that evidence in his favor, which has never been heard in a courtroom, is enough to demonstrate that Davis should be granted a new hearing.
"The Supreme Court decision is proof-positive that justice truly is blind -- blind to coerced and recanted testimony, blind to the lack of a murder weapon or physical evidence and blind to the extremely dubious circumstances that led to this man's conviction," said Larry Cox, executive director of Amnesty International USA (AIUSA). "At times there are cases that are emblematic of the dysfunctional application of justice in this country. By refusing to review serious claims of innocence, the Supreme Court has revealed catastrophic flaws in the U.S. death penalty machine."
Troy Anthony Davis, who is African American, was convicted in 1991 of murdering Mark McPhail, a white police officer. Davis ' conviction was not based on any physical evidence, and the murder weapon was never found.
The prosecution based its case on the testimony of purported "witnesses," many of whom allege police coercion. Seven of the nine non-police witnesses for the prosecution have recanted their testimony in sworn affidavits. One witness signed a police statement declaring that Davis was the assailant, then later said, "I did not read it because I cannot read." In another case a witness stated that the police "were telling me that I was an accessory to murder and that I would … go to jail for a long time and I would be lucky if I ever got out, especially because a police officer got killed … I was only 16 and was so scared of going to jail."
There are also several witnesses who have implicated another man in the murder. According to one woman, "People on the streets were talking about Sylvester Coles being involved with killing the police officer, so one day I asked him … Sylvester told me that he did shoot the officer."
Despite this, Davis' habeas corpus petition was denied by the state court on a technicality -- evidence of police coercion was "procedurally defaulted," that is, not raised earlier, so the court refused to hear it. The Georgia Supreme Court and 11th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals deferred to the state court and rejected Davis ' claims. Today the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear his case and Davis is now left without any legal recourse; he could be executed within weeks. It is shocking that in more than 12 years of appeals, no court has agreed to hear evidence of police coercion or consider the recanted testimony.
"It is appalling that so many judges were able to look away from such a grave breach of justice. Evidence of innocence simply hasn't mattered," said Sue Gunawardena-Vaughn, director of AIUSA's Program to Abolish the Death Penalty. "This should be viewed as a day of great shame for our nation, one in which the green light was given to execute a citizen who may well be innocent."